Validity Without Ground Truth: What Stated-Preference Economics Offers the Evaluation of Language Models
Provides novel methodological framework for evaluating LLMs in subjective domains where traditional accuracy metrics fail.
AI Summary
Researchers propose using stated-preference economics validity frameworks to evaluate LLMs when ground truth is unavailable, demonstrating the approach with six models on economic valuation surveys.
Excerpt
Many of the questions now put to large language models have no correct answer to score against: what a policy is worth, which option a user should choose, how to weigh competing values. Stated-preference economics has faced this problem for decades. It judges survey responses without knowing the true value, through a framework of validity and related concepts: content, construct, and criterion validity, reliability, incentive compatibility, and consequentiality. We argue that this framework is a
