← Back to feed

CorporateBench: Large-Scale Q&A Benchmarking with Temporal Knowledge Bases

L5 · ResearcherResearcharXiv· 8/27/2026

Provides crucial evaluation metrics for LLM performance on corporate-scale data with temporal consistency.

AI Summary

Researchers introduce CorporateBench, a large-scale Q&A with temporal knowledge bases evaluating LLMs on enterprise-scale document collections.

Excerpt

LLMs are increasingly able to answer complex questions about enterprise-scale document collections. But evaluation is hard: companies don't want to share internal communications, and synthetic datasets have been overly simple. We present CorporateBench (CB), a human-validated multi-task Q&A benchmark whose scale approaches the conditions LLMs encounter in corporate communication networks, with evaluation corpora surpassing 230,000 documents. CB evaluates LLMs across two dimensions (informati

Read Original
0 upvotes · 0 downvotes · 1 min read

Related Articles

L5 · ResearcherResearchHacker News
Terminal-Bench-Science: Evaluating AI agents on scientific research workflows

Stanford researchers released Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, a benchmark with 70 expert-curated scientific workflows where Claude Opus achieved only a 30% resolution rate.

L5 · ResearcherResearchLessWrong AI
The Dynamics of Intelligence Explosions

Toby Ord explores the mathematical dynamics of intelligence explosions where AI assists AI R&D, showing singular growth is harder than economic models suggest.

L4 · DeveloperResearcharXiv
Persona-Execution Separation: An Architecture Pattern for Evolving LLM Agents under Execution Audit

Presents Persona-Execution Separation, an architecture pattern for enterprise LLM agents that keeps execution auditable while allowing persona instructions to evolve freely.

L5 · ResearcherResearcharXiv
LLMs Can Design Near-Optimal OR Algorithms

GPT-5.6 can design near-optimal algorithms for operations research problems like inventory control and queueing networks, matching or beating specialized methods with minimal human input.

L5 · ResearcherResearchLessWrong AI
Do AI Models Want to Be Monitored? Measuring Monitorability Disposition in Large Reasoning Models

Researchers propose measuring 'monitorability disposition' in large reasoning models to proactively understand model behavior rather than reactively filtering outputs.