"About a quarter of them contained bugs": Gemini 4's ML R&D benchmark
Critical analysis of benchmark methodology flaws in major AI safety research directly impacts ML researchers evaluating model capabilities.
AI Summary
Google DeepMind's Gemini 4 safety report reveals 25% of its ML R&D tasks contained bugs, undermining claims about AI automating AI research.
Excerpt
Google DeepMind’s Gemini 4 Argon safety report[1] rules out its “AI automating AI research” thresholds (the ones most relevant to RSI) using a benchmark that, by the report’s own audit, has about a quarter of its scored tasks unpassable. This post dives a bit deeper into the context around this disturbing line tucked away on page 67 of the report. This is no knock on the incredible Google engineers and scientists who worked tirelessly to test Gemini as thoroughly as they could and generate this
